Commentary

05-03-2009

UNION'S FAULT?

The "Bull-Droppings" have begun by Ruan's managers in their selfish assessment of the current situation. They are attempting to spread doubt in  Local 117s' ability to handle the inconsistencies of Ruan's attempt to sabotage the process of good faith bargaining.

Comments such as: "This is your Union's fault for not accepting our (Ruan) offer. Don't you guys care about having jobs? We think that 2% is a good offer. The next company will pay you guys three dollars an hour less. Your United Grocer's Teamster brothers down the street got the contract they wanted and now are being laid off.. The reason we didn't bid, was because we didn't hear from Local 117. We're not going to bid if there's no money in it. Do you think you guys are worth more than the Local 174 drivers? My job hinges on whether you guys accept the contract from Ruan.  Standing up is one thing, but is it worth losing your jobs? You have got to expect this during these tough economic times."

These are just a few of the statements made by Ruan's management at Terminal T003 this week, and can be verified by the many drivers who heard such comments. The fact is that we are now facing possibilities of another transportation company to perform what, perhaps, could not be accomplished by Ruan.

On May 1, 2009, Local 117 Secretary Treasurer Tracy Thompson and Business Agent Pete Lamb, met with drivers at 3am. It was truly a breath of fresh air to see the "Head Teamster" come out and give her support for the Darigold/Ruan drivers of Seattle, Washington. Ms. Thompson's straight forwardness and true concept of the issues facing our collective bargaining unit was great to see and hear. The drivers were very forward in their questions and Ms.. Thompson was determined to answer every question with clarity and with no "Bull Droppings".

I noticed one clear fact... we have a new sheriff in Town and her name is Tracy Thompson. The shop stewards give their total support to this new administrator. Her vision is clear. She isn't interested in kissing the bottom of "Corporate America" resulting in the compromise of the "Core Values of Unionism". I believe that if the IBT and JC-28 give Ms. Thompson the support she deserves and needs in order to overcome the assault by "Corportate America." on the Teamsters and their families, we could achieve something special.

The clear facts of  "Corporate America's Assault" on organized labor is seen in the Oak Harbor Freight Lines labor dispute. The following quotes are from Washington Teamster Joint Council of Teamsters No. 28/ Volume 72, No.2 / Spring Quarter 2009:
  • "The 600-plus members and their families employed at Oak Harbor freight Lines, covering twelve Locals in Washington, Oregon and Idaho, that were on strike, have paid a tremendous cost in their sacrifice to protect the wages, hours of work, working conditions, healthcare and retirement benefits. These are the areas, as well as the seniority provisions, which are the CORE FOUNDATION OF TEAMSTER COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT in all sectors."
    Al Hobart. Joint Council 28 President
  • "Greed and arrogance in Corporate America have touched every American, but when it comes from those who claim to be of social concern and care for their employees, HYPOCRISY is in full bloom at the leadership of OAK HARBOR."
    Al Hobart. Joint Council 28 President

We aren't alone my friends.....But if we don't take a stand, the ability for ordinary people to have a forum to sit at the table with Corporate America, to bargain reasonable contracts with fair wages, hours of work, seniority provisions, pension and healthcare, will eventually fade away with the dust of time.

Laborwatchman

 

4-12-2009

 RUAN/DARIGOLD DRIVERS OF SEATTLE MEET ON APRIL 11TH
The Ruan/Darigold drivers of Local 117 met yesterday to discuss negotiations. After a brief  introduction, the Local's General Counsel presented various topics facing the group. The fact is that the issues facing the Ruan/Darigold drivers aren't as simple as we would like for them to be. With the economic crunch and the third party confusion still in existence since 2003, one thing is clear... We are facing an uphill challenge.
 
The Local and its bargaining team will do everything to bargain in good faith with a company that has a desire to only bid the work with demanded concessions and threats, with no indication from Darigold that they are guaranteed to be awarded the bid. The leadership of Local 117 will no doubt take the high road of good faith bargaining through Ruan's tone, and negotiate. When this writer sits back and looks at what is going on, I  wonder...what would the founding fathers of organized labor say?
 
The first and foremost responsibility is to remember that the purpose of good faith bargaining is to enable workers the ability to bargain for what is fair. Fair wages, benefits, pension, contractual language that will protect jobs, as well as balancing our demands making it fair for the employer, should be the common goal. We should make mention of the economic challenges facing some employers and then we should also make mention of employers who are doing well during the economic crunch. The fact is that this economic crunch didn't come overnight. When President Clinton left office, the signs of pending economic challenges were present. Yet, during those pending economic storms, certain employers showed enormous growth and stability.  
 
Organized labor shouldn't fall prey to the exploitation of the economic crunch, but rise above the line with Interest Based Bargaining.... an approach to bargaining that features group problem solving, open communication, and cooperation that meets the mutual interests of the union and the employer.
 
Also, Compromise and concessions, are at the heart of traditional bargaining. The request from both parties during the bargaining process of sacrificing all or part of one or more original bargaining proposals is done with the intent to achieve an agreement. But this isn't the table facing the Ruan Drivers... The " You will give this or else",  mentality by the company doesn't come close to the tradition of compromise and/or concessions.
 
Questions as to why we have to bargain under these circumstances were asked. In honoring the commitment established by the forefathers of organized labor, we must follow the scope of duty to bargain. We have an obligation to bargain in good faith, which is a requirement under federal labor law. Though we aren't happy with the tone set by this employer,  we still have the obligation to do all that is right and lawful.
 
The playing field and rules have changed for these drivers in 2003. We went from bargaining with Darigold (Former employer) to bargaining with a Third party carrier and their customer behind the scenes. We are subcontracted drivers... a term used to describe an employer's practice of contracting with an outside carrier (enterprise) to perform the same work (Outsourcing).
 
A Brief Historical Viewpoint:
 Articles by labor historians Boyer and Morals 1955, describes the latter part of the nineteenth century and the early part of the twentieth century. It depicts how workers labored under brutal conditions. Workers were expected to work 14-hour days and receive little pay. Many workers also found themselves with no safety provisions and no protection against illness, injury, unemployment, and other things that today we have taken for granted.
 
Workers had very little recourse in the face of such conditions, until the bravery of many workers organized unions to protect the workers' pay and improve the quality of their working lives. Before the 1930s, workers who attempted to form unions were subject to brutal oppression, frequently punctuated by violence that took not only THEIR LIVES, BUT THOSE OF THEIR FAMILIES AS WELL. West Virginia in the 1920s, mine workers were prevented to organize.
 
Strikers could be jailed, union organizers deported, and the rank & file workers fired without any recourse whatsoever! Yet, strikers historicall, have been the single most important means by which workers could flex their collective muscles. THE ABILITY TO WITHHOLD LABOR POWER AND HALT PRODUCTION IS ONE OF THE ONLY METHODS WORKERS CAN NEGOTIATE WITH CONFIDENCE IN MAKING CERTAIN DEMANDS FOR WORKERS.
 
That ability is now being signed away by the rank & file in various contracts. Any language proposed and signed by the rank & file that tear away at the very fabric of our movement to gain temporary marginal victories are embarrassing to say the least.
 
Don't throw out the baby with the bath water! Even if contracts tend to disproportionately represent the interest of employers, workers are still better off with contracts than without them. Remember, in the absence of contracts, employers could establish almost any kind of working condition they want.
 
Thank you,
Laborwatchman