Q & A

Home Page

If you have any questions or comments regarding the company, current status of negotiations or your job, please feel free to email me, and your questions or comments will be posted along with an answer or rebuttal.

09-11-2009

1. Congratulations! The drivers have gone through a lot, with little or no appreciation from Ruan. You have a right to celebrate...
 Thank you. Indeed, the drivers did go through a rough time with Ruan and we all are looking forward toward the new change and a fresh beginning.
 
2. Do you think that the offer will pass?
 Yes!!!!! If we don't we are all slightly in the crazy zone.
 
3. Angel and Joe, are they OK, and are they on board with the offer?
 Those two guys have worked so hard side by side with Tracy Thompson and her staff, to put together an offer that meets the present needs and future of these drivers.. When Estenson first proposed a contract with no union pension, these two guys stood still and it was an exhausting event for all involved.
 
These guys went through the events of 2003/04 and they began reliving. But with the leadership of Ms. Thompson she was able to understand the history and provide strength to Angel and Joe. Yes, Angel and Joe are on board and expect the offer to pass overwhelmingly.
 
4. What are the numbers?
Ms. Thompson deserves the right to share those numbers and she will on Sunday.
 
5. Do you think that Darigold will retaliate against the drivers?
 For what reason should Darigold retaliate against Estenson's employees for exercising the opportunity to bargain in good faith? Darigold has bigger fish to fry. Taking care of their farmers and business is on the top of their fish fry. The decision for Darigold to lock up their transportation needs for six years, will enable them to move on and concentrate on their core business competencies.
 
6. The meeting on Tuesday with the inside workers. Was it the key to sealing the deal?
 I believe it was. Anytime that solidarity is seen in such great numbers, you have to consider the enormous effects on any one business. The inside workers are to be commended for their willingness to support their drivers. (WE WILL NOT FORGET YOU!) So yes, the inside workers played a big part in making things happen.
 
7. Will Joe and Angel step down from their shop steward roles?
 No confirmation at this time on whether they will step down. There is talk that perhaps, this was their last contract.
 
8. The driver that attacked one of the stewards, will the union remove him from the local?
We all make mistakes and when we do, we learn from them and move on. The Local has not made any decisions as to the attacker. But one thing was clear...the Local does not tolerate any kind of violent behavior toward their officials.
 
9. Laborwatchman, has been once again a token of great information. I would like to thank you and hope that it will continue after the passing of the offer.
 At this time there hasn't been a final decision on the continuance or discontinuance of Laborwatchman.
 
10. I still can't stand you, you fuckin' ass hole. Watch your back!
 Dear Friend,
I am going to pray for you right now. Dear Lord in Heaven, Help Zoefish66 to surrender his bitterness...into your hands. Allow him to release his soul...from bondage and begin to lose himself from hatred. Help my friend to turn himself around and look toward your love and forgiveness, and in Jesus precious name, Amen.
 
It's over friend. Please try to move on and remember this war wasn't about me or anyone else. It was for the cause of our labor movement and providing members with future security. I can't watch my own back. I must trust in God for him to watch my back. I will continue to pray for you and hope for the best.
 
 Love, Laborwatchman.
 
Thanks, Laborwatchman.

 09-07-2009

1.Why is the Union putting out so many different approaches, thereby creating confusion?
I really don't understand your question, "Putting out different approaches". To my knowledge, there hasn't been any approaches put out. Information yes, but approaches no. That is why the union has scheduled two meetings for Tuesday, September 8th, 2009: 3:30pm for drivers and 4:30pm for the inside workers to provide further information as to where the negotiations are heading.
 
Now, there has been a team from the union that has gone out to visit the shops and speak with the membership. But the information the team has put out has been clear and concise. I don't believe the union has created any confusion at all. If there is any confusion, it's from those that are playing the assumption game and people are running with their fantasies.
 
2.Why don't you just admit it and write the truth. The fact is that your bullshit is coming to a head and just like several had predicted, Darigold has the upper hand in all of this bullshit.
What bullshit? I have been straight forward and have not tried to mislead the readers of "Laborwatchman". I have shared from the beginning that when both sides approached the economic segment of the negotiations, continued progress would depend on Darigold.
 
It's your opinion as to Darigold having the upper hand. As far as I am concerned, the membership are the ones who have the upper hand. As far as to the predictions of several, that is all they are... predictions. We are still in anticipation that a contract with Estenson and labor peace with Darigold will be the end result. I would be a liar if I didn't tell you that at times I become afraid of going through the same old BS of 2003/04. One important key is the fact that Local 117 is much bigger than Local 66. Look at the damage that Local 66 inflicted on Darigold in 2003/04. Imagine, what Local 117 can do.
 
3.What are the meetings for on Tuesday?
 Information, information and then some more information.
 
4.If this thing goes to Hell, I hope you get your ass kicked.
You are truly one of my favorite readers. Yes sir, my ass might be kicked. But it wouldn't change a thing in the long run; because this "THING" that you are referring to had nothing to do with me, and after the attempted ass kicking, we would still need to get to a contract. Stay with us brother and maintain the hope for the movement.
 
5.Fuck the Union. We pay them our fuckin' money and for what? I have had several jobs with unions and I have been screwed by the Union every time and I am sick and tired of the shit.
Friend, you have a narrow mindset of the union. First, the union isn't about dues. The union in its simplest term is this: The union is a movement with an established forum of giving opportunities to ordinary workers the ability to gain extraordinary accomplishments through the bargaining process. So, the dues are a small token of our commitment for all the hard work that our leadership engage in every day and encouraging them to continue.
 
Life isn't a box a chocolates. I believe that life is what you put in it. You know what you want and go for it. Whatever issues you feel the Union didn't take care of, you need to learn from it and move on. If you are sick and tired of it, then check your mental capacity.

09-02-2009

1.More delays and still working without a contract. When will we get a contract?
 Key words "Still Working".  Give thanks for the fact that we are still working, even if it's without a contract, for now. We continue to beat on the drum and still stand on the sound, that negotiations at times can go smoothly and it can go slowly. We are in the slow mode, but still with some movement. At this time I don't have an answer as to when you will get your contract.
 
2. A meeting took place at the Issaquah plant this morning. Can you tell me why?
 In regards to the meeting at your facility, I would encourage you to address your questions to Local 117 business agent for that union shop.
 
3. Once again, in the fuckin' middle. What can we do as members, to speed things up with our contract?
Keep coming to work and do your best to continue to serve with "Teamster Excellence" and wait for the leadership of Tracy Thompson. Hope that is seen, isn't hope, but hope that isn't seen, that's hope. Hope that we can finish.
 
4. All this positive bullshit that you keep putting out and still you don't see the writing on the wall.
 The only writing on the wall, that I am interested in seeing, is the final product of a reasonable contract. Keep looking into a wall and sooner or later, you will convince yourself that you can walk through it, until, you wake up and feel the knots on your forehead, Oops.
 
Being positive isn't bullshit. It's a way of getting through life. Try it, you may be amazed at how your life can become more fulfilled by practicing positive thoughts.
 
5. Is it true that Estenson is going to offer a 401k to the drivers?
 What do you mean, are they going to offer a 401k? They have already offered the drivers a 401k in orientation, including: health benefits.

 08-30-2009

1.Is the bargaining committee holding out on the membership?  Because if you are, you will pay dearly.
 It's not proper for you to make any threats. The bargaining committee is working hard when they meet in order to get the best deal done. But there are areas of bargaining that require the cooperation of others and without their cooperation, it makes it  more difficult to move along.
 
The bargaining committee isn't in the business of alarming the membership. The confidence and leadership of Tracy Thompson will be the key to further the process of negotiating.
 
2. Why are drivers not in company uniform?
Once again, some of those drivers are waiting for orders to come back, and those that are not willing to comply will soon face discipline. As long as you are doing the right thing, that is what matters.
 
3. What part will Darigold play in assisting the negotiations?
 The pass-through. Darigold will have to decide what they are willing to pass-through in labor costs.

During the contract with Ruan, Darigold was passing-through wages and benefits and some operational expenses. So, I would think that they will also pass-through the same with Estenson.
 
4. What are the issues that you keep sharing, need further time to work through?
Wages, Health & Welfare, Pension.
For the most part, both sides have over 90% of the contractual language done. The remaining language relates to economics and time is required to work on those issues.
 
5. If you fuckers think that is going to be easy with your bullshit, think again.
The reason that I even put your statement up, is to show how stupid you sound. What in the hell are you talking about. I have never mentioned one time of anything being easy through this process.
Instead, I have been upfront in informing you and others on this web page of the need to stay focused and maintain the faith; because it isn't easy and requires a series of serious thought process from both sides.
 
Please take your medicine and go to sleep and perhaps, when you wake up, your mind may be back to normal.

08-23-2009

1. A one day meeting. What a waste of time!
 I understand your comment from the point of getting it done. The fact is that we accomplished more on this one day since we started. When it comes to this process, you have to take what becomes available and run with it. Rome wasn't built in one day.
 
2. I keep hearing about how bad the farmers have it. Personally, I don't care about those f-#*#* farmers. All I want to know is, when are we going to get a contract?
We should care about the farmers, what they mean to us(drivers) and their families, along with their dreams and goals. Darigold is the entity of the owners "Northwest Dairy Association" that sells the members' products. Local milk producers were threatened of losing their product after collection and made it difficult to negotiate with processors.
 
The farmers had to come up with a plan to market their milk. So they stopped competing against themselves and they formed the cooperative in 1918. Washington's largest private company in annual revenue. Today, Darigold is the second-largest dairy exporter in the nation and produced a combined 8 billion pounds of milk in 2008.
 
Darigold is investing in it's co-op members' future and is correct in making this investment; because without milk Darigold fails. This investment is the understanding of what the farmer means to the survival of Darigold and what Darigold means to the farmer.
 
Consumer products, which account for about 30 percent of Darigold's sales, are seeing higher demand as more consumers dine at home during the recession.
 
Darigold and the Northwest Dairy Association have 11 processing plants in three states, with members in five states. The ability for Darigold to produce 8 billion pounds of milk is having an experienced and dependable workforce.
 
By the drivers remaining union, Darigold has sent a message of investing in the future of their transportation needs. I believe that in this current recession, there are many struggles for other companies. Corporate America has a responsibility to operate their businesses with protocols in place that will enable them to operate through tough times.
 
Transportation is in the consumer side of Darigold's business and it's up by 30%. The consumer demands are higher today even in a recession. Though, there are areas of the farmer's business that are struggling; there are other areas of good news. It's great to know that we are on the good-news-side. (source: Puget Sound Business Journal, June 19, 2009)
 
As to when a contract will be accomplished, I have no definite date. All I can say is that both sides want it done sooner than later.
 
3. Why are drivers being written up without having a contract?
Nothing prevents Estenson from disciplining their drivers. There is an Employee Handbook and they can apply those protocols as to discipline until we sign a contract with just cause. My understanding to the write up is based on product being left at wrong stores.
 
Take the time to check in the product. Especially, if a customer is trusting you to do so. It may take an additional six minutes to check in your load yourself, because in doing so you are making sure that the customer received what they ordered and the product was loaded accordingly.
 
4. Is it true that a strike vote was taken in the driver's meeting?
 I appreciate your question and prefer to not answer it at this time.
 
5. Why aren't the shop stewards allowed into the negotiations?
Are you serious and where have you been in the last five months? Whoever told you that, is playing on your emotions. The fact is that the shop stewards have been involved with negotiations since April 2009 (Ruan) and are apart of the current negotiations with Estenson and Local 117.

 08-16-2009

1. Why is Estenson delaying the negotiations?
 Estenson aren't delaying the talks. It appears that Estenson's attorney has other clients that also need his services.
 
2. Its bullshit that we are working without a contract. How much longer before we vote on a contract?
It's common for memberships to work without a renewed contract. The difference is that these memberships continue to work under the previous contract and still have all of the protection and benefits. We, on the other hand, don't have a prior contract with Estenson and currently are working without a contract during the negotiations process. Ruan's contract has expired with Ruan out the door. This is one of the interesting concepts of the outsourcing trend.
 
Be patient my friend and keep your eyes on the prize. We have good leadership in our Local.
 
3. Are we getting an extra month of medical?
 We have to meet a condition in order to receive the extra month of medical. We should know something soon.
 
4. What will happen if the drivers don't get a contract by the end of September?
 I don't know, and the bargaining committees aren't entertaining such thoughts. But we are aimed at getting it done sooner than later.
 
5. The terminal manager isn't going by seniority and I was told that Estenson would. Why are they not keeping their word?
The fact is that the site manager is going by seniority and is working very hard with what he has. In the last two weeks the operation has been better than it has in the last two years

 08-07-2009

1.What the Hell is it taking so long to get to the economics of the contract?
Economics are like a good slowed cooked stew. Economics are traditionally the slowest and most important part of any contract. Informational request are often made when it comes to economics and it takes time to go through the requested information.
 
Stay the course and soon economics will be announced.
 
2. Is Estenson's lawyer a union buster?
No, I don't believe so. My impression of their lawyer, is that he's very seasoned. He has not shown any hostile posturing and is very willing to consider the union's proposals. A very pleasant attitude and easy to talk to.
 
3. Why are some drivers wearing uniforms and some are not?
 Some drivers are waiting for the rest of their uniforms to arrive. Some need alterations.
 
4. Do you think that Darigold will hinder the contract negotiations?
No, I don't think they are interested in hindering transportation at all. In fact, they are willing to do all that they can to help the negotiations along. I believe the biggest part of Darigold's involvement in the negotiations will be the economics portion.
 
5.Why is Darigold willing to pay the warehouse workers more in hourly wages, than the drivers?
First, I am glad for any Teamster to make a fair and reasonable hourly wage. I believe Darigold is aware of what they are paying the inside workers and just a few months ago were paying the drivers equally the same. But through the change of carriers, we have to negotiate again in order to maintain our previous hourly wages. I think it is fair to say, that both companies are aware and have been informed that the drivers have no intention of going backwards again.

 

07-31-2009

1.What was the decision on the ponytail drama?
 Local 117 leadership finally got an official answer from Darigold, informing them of the grooming requirements and indicating that this new look is part of bringing the high standards of old. Therefore, Darigold was firm in their professional look for the Estenson drivers. Those members who are affected received calls and were informed on cutting their ponytails. Failure to adhere to the grooming policy could result in progressive discipline and up to termination.
 
2, Did the Local ask Estenson of keeping the present hourly rate while negotiations proceed?
 Estenson expressed the goal of completing the CBA, and then apply the bargained rates with retro-activity.
Once again, Estenson has their right of completing the bargaining process and then applying the end results.
 
 
3. Is it true that drivers are divided and even fighting among themselves?
Absolutely not! The majority of drivers are on the same sheet of music and awaiting the completion of the bargaining process.
In fact, the meeting on July 26, 2009 was very informative and positive. Look friends, are there times when disagreements among the rank and file happen? Yes, and during those times, the stronger among the rank and file surround those members whose faith my be weak, lift them up with a positive outlook. Those members whose aim is to spread constant negativity among the rank and file, you ignore, move on, and eventually, they will see the light.
 
 
4. I have been in the union for a long time and I would like to say, that your ability to communicate simple facts in order to give an understanding is so freshening to many of us. I retired several years ago and I remembered during the lockout... that "Laborwatchman" was so instrumental in bringing so many together. Thank you, for your earnest commitment to informing so many of us that still care.
 Thank you. There are many who think different about this website. They hate it! But it's so nice to hear comments of the work that I try to convey every day, week and month. Thank you for your years of service for the movement.
 
Love always, Laborwatchman. 
 
5. The Local are proposing a three year contract with Darigold/Estenson. Do you think that Estenson will ask for six year sting?
 Yes. I think that it would best serve Darigold to have transportation locked up for the duration of their third party contract between them and Estenson. Now, with this said, in order to persuade the membership to take such a long contract, it will require an enormous economic incentive to even consider such a commitment. Economics would be in the forefront of such a long deal into an uncertain future. Yes, I believe that Estenson will ask for a six year contract as oppose to three.
 
Thanks, Laborwatchman.

 07-27-2009

1. Why was a strike vote taken?
 It is part of the bargaining process and it's one of those elements that you need to have in place, since we are bargaining with Estenson for our first contract.
On the other hand, if we had a labor agreement with Estenson, then if we came to impasse, we could possibly work under the expired contract, until one is reached. Since we don't have a contract with Estenson, we must prepare in the event an impasse is activated with their refusal to bargain any further. I don't anticipate that this will happen, but being ready for the unexpected is a prudent step.
 
2. When will we strike?
 We're not. We have no intention of going on strike and once again it's part of the process.
 
3. I heard that drivers aren't reporting to work on August 1st, 2009, without entering negotiations.Why are you fuckin' drivers trying to put the inside workers out of work?
 First, what you heard isn't true. The fact is that the drivers are going to report for work as scheduled and go through the process of negotiations. Our brothers and sisters inside the plant are at the forefront of our negotiations and we have no intentions on hurting your chances for a reasonable contract with Darigold in 2010.
 
When your time of negotiations come, the drivers will not let you down. Our support will be even stronger for you. We aren't "fuckin drivers", we are your brothers and sisters of the "Teamsterhood".
 
4. Are you really this positive, that Estenson/Darigold will negotiate in good faith?
Yes, I am. We are ready to work around the clock to get to a reasonable contract with Estenson/Darigold. Look, Estenson, wants to develop the Northwest and they are aware that their success starts with Darigold. They will work hard with Darigold to get a deal done.
 
5. When it comes to giving concessions...what will be given?
First, lets talk about making concessions: The fact is that agreements are possible in traditional bargaining...but only through compromise. A successful negotiation is based on the understanding as to what to concede and how to make concessions. The inexperienced will come out taking extreme positions, with a refusal to budge.
 
Our bargaining committee will not avoid making necessary compromises based on fear of a negative reaction from the membership.. Frankly, it is not possible to fulfill all of the needs, desires, or expectations of every union member all of the time. If you're able to satisfy a majority of the membership, then it's possible to get a new contract ratified.
 
As to what will be conceded, depends. The union isn't obligated to make concessions on every one of its proposals. The fact is that the union is expected to hold firm on the top priority agendas of our proposals. Holding on to those agendas shouldn't be considered bad-faith-bargaining, provided that the bargaining committee demonstrate a willingness to compromise on other things.
 
When the union prepares its proposals, it also has to anticipate the kinds of concessions it might have to make at the time, their proposals are made. Homework, homework, homework!
Personally, I don't care if many of you want a quick contract. It's not happening. Our job as a bargaining committee is to bargain in good-faith and with your interest in the forefront. Not only your needs, but the needs of your families.
 
We don't believe in small marginal victories that will produce problems in the future for our members. What we believe is to plan and develop consistent proposals with the thought of present teamsters and their families, but those teamsters in the future as well.
 
I hope this helps.
 
 
Thanks, laborwatchman.

07-25-2009

1.Word has it that drivers need to get a withdrawal card from Local 117 in order to not pay dues, since we don't have a contract. Should we?
 Let's take a look at this. We expect our Local to negotiate a contract and at the same time, we send a message that we don't want to be a part of the Local. Hell no! Local 117 is the local that we belong to and to suggest this foolish idea is to declare suicide.
 
We will continue to pay our dues and encourage our Local's leadership to negotiate in good faith, until we reach a CBA with Darigold/Estenson.
 
2. Several drivers this week were suggesting that Local 117 should demand a contract by July 31st, 2009.
Our first meeting with Estenson was on July 16, 2009 and we have not even begun negotiating from both sides. To suggest such an idea is clear that many don't understand this process. So allow me to educate some and annoy others.
 
During negotiations, the committee must be flexible and at the same time creative in putting together new concessions without compromising or gutting our movement's original proposals.
Furthermore, we must allow a considerable amount of time in exploring Estenson's positions. Regardless, of how outrageous or impractical a employer's demands are, we must never choose to outright reject without attempting to counter propose.
 
During the time a company chooses to demand, the bargaining committee should discuss every detail of every proposal in length. When looking at a company's proposal, the union should make numerous request in order to gain clarification to understand the company's information.
 
The bargaining committee should then caucus (meet) frequently and take as much time as needed to adequately review all the information obtained from the company, as a result of the union's requests.
 
If the company believes that total impasse has been reached and the union believes that it hasn't, then this disagreement is determined by the National Labor Relation Board (NLRB). When the company refuses to bargain; the the union should file an Unfair-Labor-Practice charge.(ULP)
 
Simply put, it's not practical to demand a contract with a new company or any company without the process of bargaining. It would place the local at a disadvantage. Contract negotiations aren't intended to be a one-night-stand. You have to take your time and do it right.
 
3. Why do the drivers have to lose $3.50 an hour, when Estenson can agree to bridge the Ruan contract?
Estenson has agreed to bargaining for a contract. It's understood that with the completion of the negotiations with an agreed CBA, there will be retroactivity. Estenson has agreed to bargain with the existing union. Estenson, isn't bound by Ruan's previous negotiations. They will bargain with Local 117 for a new CBA. Estenson being the new employer, has retained a majority of the former employer's (Ruan) work force, and is continuing operations with Darigold.
 
None of us are happy of working for $19.00 dollars an hour, while negotiations are being conducted. But the fact that they are willing to give us retro, should be comforting for the time being.  
 
4. I heard, that the ST of Local 117 is negotiating her first contract. Is this true?
 No. This isn't true. In fact, Ms. Thompson has plenty of years within her career in negotiating contracts.
 
5. Why can't we strike on August 1, 2009, since we don't have a contract?
Without bargaining in good-faith, the risk associated with this strategy is a quick IMPASSE, which frees the employer from further bargaining. Imagine, the unwise decision to force Estenson into a contract isn't the proper approach to traditional bargaining. 

07-20-2009

1.What the fuck are you talking about? This is far from positive! This company is intending on weeding out more drivers in the next 90 days.
Dear Friend, Yes, I still believe that what I see is more positive. Estenson is truly challenging their drivers to become more professional. I think it is needed and we all are capable of fulfilling their demands and expectations.
 
As to the weeding out drivers, I believe if drivers aren't willing to adapt, then they will weed themselves out. Look, do I agree that the expectations are more demanding then what we are used to? Yes, but when you take a step back and look at what they're asking, it's all part of the commercial driver's safety attitude that we should have.
 
2. What in the hell does having a ponytail have to do with delivering milk?
The customer, Darigold, expects to have a cleaner and presentable work force. They have asked the carrier (Estenson) to bring back the professional look of old. Look, you are asking the wrong guy. I am former military and I like having a uniform and hopefully, one that will fit.
 
Now, to answer your question. A ponytail, has nothing to do with the delivery of anything. But the employer has the right to enforce their own working conditions. By the way, pilots cannot have ponytails and neither can police officers. The Washington State Patrol has one of the most demanding appearance policy within the state. Yet, they have no problem filling their job positions. The point being made is that if you want to work, then you must comply.
 
3. It seems to be implied that equipment damages not recorded or reported during pre-trip inpection will be a safety bonus deduction and not a payroll decuction
 My answer is based on the information handed out on July 17, 2009, orientation and for quoting purposes, please look at the "Welcome ELC drivers & Staff, Northwest Regional-Darigold and New Driver Orientation hand out. Also the Estenson's Employee HandBook.
 
There seems to be three phases to driver's being charged.
1. Phase One ( Safety Bonus)
2. Phase two (Equipment Damages found during pre-trip inspections)
3. Phase three ("Fix It" citations)
 
The subject of "Safety Bonus"(Phase one) found on page 10 of your new orientation hand out is quoted as saying, "Safety bonus forfeiture can occur on the monthly accrued basis for cost related safety infractions. Costs associated with accidents, incidents, maintenance, freight claims, and damages are evaluated at the end of the year and are deducted from a driver's accumulated safety bonus,"
 
So, every month that you go without an infraction of those items mentioned above, you accumulate $50.00 dollars a month. The incentive is to not have any infractions for the year and receive the $600.00 dollars (12x50=$600) as a bonus reward recognition. Now, lets say you have an incident anytime during the annual accumulated period and after an investigation they determined that it was preventable. The cost is determined to be $100.00 dollars. At the end of the year, if all you had was this incident for $100.00, it would be deducted from your annual accumulated safety bonus. So, the company would subtract $100.00 dollars from $600.00 dollars, and you would be awarded $500.00 dollars.
 
Phase two seems to be directed toward Equipment damages that aren't discovered or reported during the pre-trip. Page 10, Slide 20 #7 is quoted; Equipment damages found during pre-trip inspections must be reported to dispatch prior to moving the equipment. This applies to fresh damages. Damaged found during a pre-trip inspection will be investigated, and REPAIR COST charged against the last driver or driver found to be negligent by the investigation.
 
What isn't clear is, if the repair cost will be applied toward the bonus or payroll. Especially when making reference to REPAIR COST. It seems to be implied that equipment damages not recorded or reported during pre-trip inspection will be a payroll deduction. 
 
Then you have phase three. The citation "fix it" found in the Estenson's Employee Handbook on page 22 is quoted as saying, Generally speaking, drivers are held personally accountable for "fix it" citations which are deemed to have been preventable through the completion of a thorough pre-trip inspection. Preventable citations for parking or overweight violations may also be the personal responsibility of the driver. Moving violations are extremely serious offenses. Moving violations will be the FULL FINANCIAL responsibility of the driver..
 
The quote above is simple and direct. If you as a driver receive a citation for any "fix it", you're paying the bill.
 
I have tried to answer your question as best as I could. Notice to all the drivers, please take the time to read your material. This weekend your shop stewards spent five hours reading and highlighting this material. We have a lot of work ahead of us. 
 
 
4. What happens to the members with hair-tails that won't cut them and can the union step in?
 If those drivers who have hair-tails as you put it, won't cut them in order to comply with the working conditions, they won't be allow to work. At this time, it's too early as to what the union can do or not do about the hair-tails.
 
In my opinion, we have bigger fish to fry, then worrying about hairstyles.
 
5. The orientation was conducted with a taste of non-union. Doesn't this company understand that we will be union? This bullshit won't fly!
 Yes sir, Estenson is fully aware of the need to bargain with Local 117 and the process began on July 16, 2009. I disagree slightly. My opinion is that the orientation was conducted as to what they are accustomed to. This is Estenson's first time hiring union workers and entering into bargaining. As to what bullshit you're referring to, I don't know.
 
The only bullshit that I am aware of, is the lousy-goosy why of conducting business is definitely going to change. Drivers and managers will be held accountable.
 
6. You cheesy mother f**#er! You sound like a soft bitch. How much are they paying you to surrender your balls?
Some of you would question why I answer this person. Look, I believe in the freedom of speech and no matter what manner people choose to express themselves, they need to be heard.
 
Dear Friend,
You are angry. But once again you are placing the focus on personal. This is the last question that I will answer from you, when using this kind of verbal context. You are an adult and I want you to conduct yourself as such.
 
I am speaking my opinion and if you don't like what you are reading, then don't connect. It's that simple.
 

Q & A Archives
05-30-2009 thru 07-14-2009
05-29-2009
05-20-2009
05-12-2009
05-04-2009

 

 
Thank you for your questions and please send me more.
Laborwatchman

Home Page