|
Q & AIf you have any questions or comments regarding the company, current status of negotiations or your job, please feel free to email me, and your questions or comments will be posted along with an answer or rebuttal. 09-11-2009
1. Congratulations! The drivers have gone
through a lot, with little or no appreciation from Ruan. You have a
right to celebrate...
Thank you. Indeed, the drivers did go through
a rough time with Ruan and we all are looking forward toward the new
change and a fresh beginning.
2. Do you think that the offer will pass?
Yes!!!!! If we don't we are all slightly in
the crazy zone.
3. Angel and Joe, are they OK, and are they on
board with the offer?
Those two guys have worked so hard side by
side with Tracy Thompson and her staff, to put together an offer
that meets the present needs and future of these drivers.. When
Estenson first proposed a contract with no union pension, these two
guys stood still and it was an exhausting event for all involved.
These guys went through the events of 2003/04
and they began reliving. But with the leadership of Ms. Thompson she
was able to understand the history and provide strength to Angel and
Joe. Yes, Angel and Joe are on board and expect the offer to pass
overwhelmingly.
4. What are the numbers?
Ms. Thompson deserves the right to share those
numbers and she will on Sunday.
5. Do you think that Darigold will retaliate
against the drivers?
For what reason should Darigold retaliate
against Estenson's employees for exercising the opportunity to
bargain in good faith? Darigold has bigger fish to fry. Taking care
of their farmers and business is on the top of their fish fry. The
decision for Darigold to lock up their transportation needs for six
years, will enable them to move on and concentrate on their core
business competencies.
6. The meeting on Tuesday with the inside
workers. Was it the key to sealing the deal?
I believe it was. Anytime that solidarity is
seen in such great numbers, you have to consider the enormous
effects on any one business. The inside workers are to be commended
for their willingness to support their drivers. (WE WILL NOT FORGET
YOU!) So yes, the inside workers played a big part in making things
happen.
7. Will Joe and Angel step down from their
shop steward roles?
No confirmation at this time on whether they
will step down. There is talk that perhaps, this was their last
contract.
8. The driver that attacked one of the
stewards, will the union remove him from the local?
We all make mistakes and when we do, we learn
from them and move on. The Local has not made any decisions as to
the attacker. But one thing was clear...the Local does not tolerate
any kind of violent behavior toward their officials.
9. Laborwatchman, has been once again a token
of great information. I would like to thank you and hope that it
will continue after the passing of the offer.
At this time there hasn't been a final
decision on the continuance or discontinuance of Laborwatchman.
10. I still can't stand you, you fuckin' ass
hole. Watch your back!
Dear Friend,
I am going to pray for you right now. Dear Lord in Heaven, Help
Zoefish66 to surrender his bitterness...into your hands. Allow him
to release his soul...from bondage and begin to lose himself from
hatred. Help my friend to turn himself around and look toward your
love and forgiveness, and in Jesus precious name, Amen.
It's over friend. Please try to move on and remember this war wasn't
about me or anyone else. It was for the cause of our labor movement
and providing members with future security. I can't watch my own
back. I must trust in God for him to watch my back. I will continue
to pray for you and hope for the best.
Love, Laborwatchman.
Thanks, Laborwatchman.
09-07-2009
1.Why is the Union putting out so many
different approaches, thereby creating confusion?
I really don't understand your question,
"Putting out different approaches". To my knowledge, there hasn't
been any approaches put out. Information yes, but approaches
no. That is why the union has scheduled two meetings for Tuesday,
September 8th, 2009: 3:30pm for drivers and 4:30pm for the inside
workers to provide further information as to where the negotiations
are heading.
Now, there has been a team from the union that has gone out to visit
the shops and speak with the membership. But the information the
team has put out has been clear and concise. I don't believe the
union has created any confusion at all. If there is any confusion,
it's from those that are
playing the assumption game
and people are
running with their fantasies.
2.Why don't you just admit it and write the
truth. The fact is that your bullshit is coming to a head and just
like several had
predicted, Darigold has the upper hand in all of
this bullshit.
What
bullshit? I have been straight forward and have not tried to
mislead the readers of "Laborwatchman". I have shared from the
beginning that when both sides approached the economic segment of
the negotiations, continued progress would depend on Darigold.
It's your opinion as to Darigold having the
upper hand. As far as I am concerned, the membership are the
ones who have the upper hand. As far as to the
predictions of
several, that is all they are... predictions. We are still in
anticipation that a contract with Estenson and labor peace with
Darigold will be the end result. I would be a liar if I didn't tell
you that at times I become afraid of going through the same old BS
of 2003/04. One important key is the fact that Local 117 is much
bigger than Local 66. Look at the damage that Local 66 inflicted on
Darigold in 2003/04. Imagine, what Local 117 can do.
3.What are the meetings for on Tuesday?
Information, information and then some more
information.
4.If this thing goes to
Hell, I hope you get your
ass kicked.
You are truly one of
my favorite readers. Yes sir, my ass might be kicked. But it
wouldn't change a thing in the long run; because this "THING" that
you are referring to had nothing to do with me, and after the
attempted ass kicking, we would still need to get to a contract.
Stay with us brother and maintain the hope for the movement.
5.Fuck the Union. We pay them our fuckin'
money and for what? I have had several jobs with unions and I have
been screwed by the Union every time and I am sick and tired of the
shit.
Friend, you have a narrow mindset of the
union. First, the union isn't about dues. The union in its simplest
term is this: The union
is a movement with an established forum of giving opportunities to
ordinary workers the ability to gain extraordinary accomplishments
through the bargaining process. So, the dues are a small
token of our commitment for all the hard work that our leadership
engage in every day and encouraging them to continue.
Life isn't a box a chocolates. I believe that life is what you put
in it. You know what you want and go for it. Whatever issues you
feel the Union didn't take care of, you need to learn from it and
move on. If you are sick and tired of it, then check your
mental capacity.
09-02-2009
1.More delays and still working without a
contract. When will we get a contract?
Key words "Still Working". Give thanks for
the fact that we are still working, even if it's without a contract,
for now. We continue to beat on the drum and still stand on the
sound, that negotiations at times can go smoothly and it can go
slowly. We are in the slow mode, but still with some movement.
At this time I don't have an answer as to when you will get
your contract.
2. A meeting took place at the Issaquah plant
this morning. Can you tell me why?
In regards to the meeting at your facility, I
would encourage you to address your questions to Local 117 business
agent for that union shop.
3. Once again, in the fuckin' middle. What can
we do as members, to speed things up with our contract?
Keep coming to work and do your best to
continue to serve with "Teamster Excellence" and wait for the
leadership of Tracy Thompson. Hope that is seen, isn't hope, but
hope that isn't seen, that's hope. Hope that we can finish.
4. All this positive bullshit that you keep
putting out and still you don't see the
writing on the wall.
The only writing on the wall, that I am
interested in seeing, is the final product of a reasonable contract.
Keep looking into a wall and sooner or later, you will convince
yourself that you can walk through it, until, you wake up and feel the knots on your forehead, Oops.
Being positive isn't bullshit. It's a way of
getting through life. Try it, you may be amazed at how your life can
become more fulfilled by practicing positive thoughts.
5. Is it true that Estenson is going to offer
a 401k to the drivers?
What do you mean, are they going to offer a
401k? They have already offered the drivers a 401k in orientation,
including: health benefits.
08-30-2009
1.Is the bargaining committee holding out
on the membership? Because if you are, you will pay dearly.
It's not proper for you
to make any threats. The
bargaining committee is working hard when they meet in order to
get the best deal done. But there are areas of bargaining that
require the cooperation of others and without their cooperation,
it makes it more difficult to move along.
The bargaining committee isn't in the
business of alarming the membership. The confidence and
leadership of Tracy Thompson will be the key to further the
process of negotiating.
2. Why are drivers not in company uniform?
Once again, some of those drivers are
waiting for orders to come back, and those that are not willing
to comply will soon face discipline. As long as you are doing
the right thing, that is what matters.
3. What part will Darigold play in
assisting the negotiations?
The pass-through. Darigold will have to
decide what they are willing to pass-through in labor costs.
During the contract with Ruan, Darigold was passing-through wages and benefits and some operational expenses. So, I would think that they will also pass-through the same with Estenson.
4. What are the issues that you
keep sharing, need further time to work through?
Wages, Health & Welfare,
Pension.
For the most part, both sides have over 90% of the contractual language done. The remaining language relates to economics and time is required to work on those issues.
5. If you fuckers think that is going to
be easy with your bullshit, think again.
The reason that I even put your statement
up, is to show how stupid
you sound. What in the hell are you talking about. I have
never mentioned one time of anything being easy through this
process.
Instead, I have been upfront in informing
you and others on this web page of the need to stay focused and
maintain the faith; because it isn't easy and requires a series
of serious thought process from both sides.
Please take
your medicine and go to
sleep and perhaps, when you wake up,
your mind may be back
to normal.
08-23-2009
1. A one day meeting. What a waste of time!
I understand your comment from the point of
getting it done. The fact is that we accomplished more on this one
day since we started. When it comes to this process, you have to
take what becomes available and run with it. Rome wasn't built in
one day.
2. I keep hearing about how bad the farmers
have it. Personally, I don't care about those f-#*#* farmers. All I
want to know is, when are we going to get a contract?
We should care about the farmers, what they
mean to us(drivers) and their families, along with their dreams and
goals. Darigold is the entity of the owners "Northwest Dairy
Association" that sells the members' products. Local milk producers
were threatened of losing their product after collection and made
it difficult to negotiate with processors.
The farmers had to come up with a plan to
market their milk. So they stopped competing against themselves and
they formed the cooperative in 1918. Washington's largest private
company in annual revenue. Today, Darigold is the second-largest
dairy exporter in the nation and produced a combined 8 billion
pounds of milk in 2008.
Darigold is investing in it's co-op members'
future and is correct in making this investment; because without
milk Darigold fails. This investment is the understanding of what
the farmer means to the survival of Darigold and what Darigold means
to the farmer.
Consumer products, which account for about 30
percent of Darigold's sales, are seeing higher demand as more
consumers dine at home during the recession.
Darigold and the Northwest Dairy Association
have 11 processing plants in three states, with members in five
states. The ability for Darigold to produce 8 billion pounds of milk
is having an experienced and dependable workforce.
By the drivers remaining union, Darigold has
sent a message of investing in the future of their transportation
needs. I believe that in this current recession, there are many
struggles for other companies. Corporate America has a responsibility
to operate their businesses with protocols in place that will enable
them to operate through tough times.
Transportation is in the consumer side of
Darigold's business and it's up by 30%. The consumer demands are
higher today even in a recession. Though, there are areas of the
farmer's business that are struggling; there are other areas of good
news. It's great to know that we are on the good-news-side. (source:
Puget Sound Business Journal, June 19, 2009)
As to when a contract will be accomplished, I
have no definite date. All I can say is that both sides want it done
sooner than later.
3. Why are drivers being written up without
having a contract?
Nothing prevents Estenson from disciplining
their drivers. There is an Employee Handbook and they can apply
those protocols as to discipline until we sign a contract with just
cause. My understanding to the write up is based on
product being
left at wrong stores.
Take the time to check in the product.
Especially, if a customer is trusting you to do so. It may take an
additional six minutes to check in your load yourself, because in
doing so you are making sure that the customer received what they
ordered and the product was loaded accordingly.
4. Is it true that a strike vote was taken in
the driver's meeting?
I appreciate your question and prefer to not
answer it at this time.
5. Why aren't the shop stewards allowed into the
negotiations?
Are you serious and where have you been in the
last five months? Whoever told you that,
is playing on your
emotions. The fact is that the shop stewards have been involved with
negotiations since April 2009 (Ruan) and are apart of the current
negotiations with Estenson and Local 117.
08-16-2009
1. Why is Estenson delaying the negotiations?
Estenson aren't delaying the talks. It
appears that Estenson's attorney has other clients that also need
his services.
2. Its
bullshit that we are working without a
contract. How much longer before we vote on a contract?
It's common for memberships to work without a
renewed contract. The difference is that these memberships continue
to work under the previous contract and still have all of the
protection and benefits. We, on the other hand, don't have a prior
contract with Estenson and currently are working without a contract
during the negotiations process. Ruan's contract has expired with
Ruan out the door. This is one of the interesting concepts of the
outsourcing trend.
Be patient my friend and keep your eyes on the prize. We have good
leadership in our Local.
3. Are we getting an extra month of medical?
We have to meet a condition in order to
receive the extra month of medical. We should know something soon.
4. What will happen if the drivers don't get a
contract by the end of September?
I don't know, and the bargaining committees
aren't entertaining such thoughts. But we are aimed at getting it
done sooner than later.
5. The terminal manager isn't going by
seniority and I was told that Estenson would. Why are they not
keeping their word?
The fact is that the site manager is going by
seniority and is working very hard with what he has. In the last two
weeks the operation has been better than it has in the last two
years
08-07-2009
1.What the Hell is it taking so long to get
to the economics of the contract?
Economics are like a good slowed cooked stew.
Economics are traditionally the slowest and most important part of
any contract. Informational request are often made when it comes to
economics and it takes time to go through the requested information.
Stay the course and soon economics will be announced.
2. Is Estenson's lawyer a union buster?
No, I don't believe so. My impression of their
lawyer, is that he's very seasoned. He has not shown any hostile
posturing and is very willing to consider the union's proposals. A
very pleasant attitude and easy to talk to.
3. Why are some drivers wearing uniforms and
some are not?
Some drivers are waiting for the rest of
their uniforms to arrive. Some need alterations.
4. Do you think that Darigold will hinder the
contract negotiations?
No, I don't think they are interested in
hindering transportation at all. In fact, they are willing to do all
that they can to help the negotiations along. I believe the biggest
part of Darigold's involvement in the negotiations will be the
economics portion.
5.Why is Darigold willing to pay the warehouse
workers more in hourly wages, than the drivers?
First, I am glad for any Teamster to make a
fair and reasonable hourly wage. I believe Darigold is aware of what
they are paying the inside workers and just a few months ago were
paying the drivers equally the same. But through the change of
carriers, we have to negotiate again in order to maintain our
previous hourly wages. I think it is fair to say, that both
companies are aware and have been informed that the drivers have no
intention of going backwards again.
07-31-2009
1.What was the
decision on the ponytail drama?
Local 117 leadership finally got an
official answer from Darigold, informing them of the grooming
requirements and indicating that this new look is part of bringing
the high standards of old. Therefore, Darigold was firm in their
professional look for the Estenson drivers. Those members who are
affected received calls and were informed on cutting their
ponytails. Failure to adhere to the grooming policy could result in
progressive discipline and up to termination.
2, Did the Local ask Estenson of
keeping the present hourly rate while negotiations proceed?
Estenson expressed the goal of
completing the CBA, and then apply the bargained rates with
retro-activity.
Once again, Estenson has their right
of completing the bargaining process and then applying the end
results.
3. Is it true that drivers are
divided and even fighting among themselves?
Absolutely not! The majority of
drivers are on the same sheet of music and awaiting the completion
of the bargaining process.
In fact, the meeting on July 26, 2009
was very informative and positive. Look friends, are there times
when disagreements among the rank and file happen? Yes, and during
those times, the stronger among the rank and file surround those
members whose faith my be weak, lift them up with a positive
outlook. Those members whose aim is to spread constant negativity
among the rank and file, you ignore, move on, and eventually, they
will see the light.
4. I have been in the union for a
long time and I would like to say, that your ability to communicate
simple facts in order to give an understanding is so freshening to
many of us. I retired several years ago and I remembered during the
lockout... that "Laborwatchman" was so instrumental in bringing so
many together. Thank you, for your earnest commitment to informing
so many of us that still care.
Thank you. There are many who think
different about this website. They hate it! But it's so nice to hear
comments of the work that I try to convey every day, week and month.
Thank you for your years of service for the movement.
Love always, Laborwatchman.
5. The Local are proposing a three year
contract with Darigold/Estenson. Do you think that Estenson will ask
for six year sting?
Yes. I think
that it would best serve Darigold to have transportation locked up
for the duration of their third party contract between them and
Estenson. Now, with this said, in order to persuade the membership
to take such a long contract, it will require an enormous economic
incentive to even consider such a commitment. Economics would be in
the forefront of such a long deal into an uncertain future. Yes, I
believe that Estenson will ask for a six year contract as oppose to
three.
Thanks, Laborwatchman.
07-27-2009
1. Why was a strike vote taken?
It is part of the bargaining process and it's
one of those elements that you need to have in place, since we are
bargaining with Estenson for our first contract.
On the other hand, if we had a labor agreement with Estenson, then
if we came to impasse, we could possibly work under the expired
contract, until one is reached. Since we don't have a contract with
Estenson, we must prepare in the event an impasse is activated with
their refusal to bargain any further. I don't anticipate that this
will happen, but being ready for the unexpected is a prudent step.
2. When will we strike?
We're not. We have no intention of going on
strike and once again it's part of the process.
3. I heard that drivers aren't reporting to
work on August 1st, 2009, without entering negotiations.Why are you
fuckin' drivers trying to put the inside workers out of work?
First, what you heard isn't true. The fact is
that the drivers are going to report for work as scheduled and go
through the process of negotiations. Our brothers and sisters inside
the plant are at the forefront of our negotiations and we have no
intentions on hurting your chances for a reasonable contract with
Darigold in 2010.
When your time of negotiations come, the
drivers will not let you down. Our support will be even stronger for
you. We aren't "fuckin drivers", we are your brothers and sisters of
the "Teamsterhood".
4. Are you really this positive, that Estenson/Darigold
will negotiate in good faith?
Yes, I am. We are ready to work around the
clock to get to a reasonable contract with Estenson/Darigold. Look,
Estenson, wants to develop the Northwest and they are aware that
their success starts with Darigold. They will work hard with
Darigold to get a deal done.
5. When it comes to giving
concessions...what will be given?
First, lets talk about making concessions: The
fact is that agreements are possible in traditional bargaining...but
only through compromise. A successful negotiation is based on the
understanding as to what to concede and how to make concessions.
The inexperienced will come out taking extreme positions, with a
refusal to budge.
Our bargaining committee will not avoid making
necessary compromises based on fear of a negative reaction from the
membership.. Frankly, it is not possible to fulfill all of the
needs, desires, or expectations of every union member all of the
time. If you're able to satisfy a majority of the membership, then
it's possible to get a new contract ratified.
As to what will be conceded, depends. The
union isn't obligated to make concessions on every one of its
proposals. The fact is that the union is expected to hold firm on
the top priority agendas of our proposals. Holding on to
those agendas shouldn't be considered bad-faith-bargaining, provided
that the bargaining committee demonstrate a willingness to
compromise on other things.
When the union prepares its proposals, it also
has to anticipate the kinds of concessions it might have to make at
the time, their proposals are made. Homework, homework, homework!
Personally, I don't care if many of you want a
quick contract. It's not happening. Our job as a bargaining
committee is to bargain in good-faith and with your interest in the
forefront. Not only your needs, but the needs of your families.
We don't believe in small marginal victories
that will produce problems in the future for our members. What we
believe is to plan and develop consistent proposals with the thought
of present teamsters and their families, but those teamsters in the
future as well.
I hope this helps.
Thanks, laborwatchman.
07-25-2009
1.Word has it that drivers need to get a
withdrawal card from Local 117 in order to not pay dues, since
we don't have a contract. Should we?
Let's take a look at this. We expect our
Local to negotiate a contract and at the same time, we send a
message that we don't want to be a part of the Local. Hell no!
Local 117 is the local that we belong to and to suggest this
foolish idea is to declare suicide.
We will continue to pay our dues and encourage our Local's
leadership to negotiate in good faith, until we reach a CBA with
Darigold/Estenson.
2. Several drivers this week were
suggesting that Local 117 should demand a contract by July 31st,
2009.
Our first meeting with Estenson was on
July 16, 2009 and we have not even begun negotiating from both
sides. To suggest such an idea is clear that many don't
understand this process. So allow me to educate some and annoy
others.
During negotiations, the committee must be flexible and at the
same time creative in putting together new concessions without
compromising or gutting our movement's original proposals.
Furthermore, we must allow a considerable amount of time in
exploring Estenson's positions. Regardless, of how outrageous or
impractical a employer's demands are, we must never choose to
outright reject without attempting to counter propose.
During the time a company chooses to demand, the bargaining
committee should discuss every detail of every proposal in
length. When looking at a company's proposal, the union should
make numerous request in order to gain clarification to
understand the company's information.
The bargaining committee should then caucus (meet) frequently
and take as much time as needed to adequately review all the
information obtained from the company, as a result of the
union's requests.
If the company believes that total impasse has been reached and
the union believes that it hasn't, then this disagreement is
determined by the National Labor Relation Board (NLRB). When the
company refuses to bargain; the the union should file an
Unfair-Labor-Practice charge.(ULP)
Simply put, it's not practical to demand a contract with a new
company or any company without the process of bargaining. It
would place the local at a disadvantage. Contract negotiations
aren't intended to be a one-night-stand. You have to take your
time and do it right.
3. Why do the drivers have to lose $3.50
an hour, when Estenson can agree to bridge the Ruan contract?
Estenson has agreed to bargaining for a
contract. It's understood that with the completion of the
negotiations with an agreed CBA, there will be retroactivity.
Estenson has agreed to bargain with the existing union. Estenson,
isn't bound by Ruan's previous negotiations. They will bargain
with Local 117 for a new CBA. Estenson being the new employer,
has retained a majority of the former employer's (Ruan) work
force, and is continuing operations with Darigold.
None of us are happy of working for $19.00 dollars an hour,
while negotiations are being conducted. But the fact that they
are willing to give us retro, should be comforting for the time
being.
4. I heard, that the ST of Local 117 is
negotiating her first contract. Is this true?
No. This isn't true. In fact, Ms.
Thompson has plenty of years within her career in negotiating
contracts.
5. Why can't we strike on August 1, 2009,
since we don't have a contract?
Without bargaining in good-faith, the risk
associated with this strategy is a quick IMPASSE, which frees
the employer from further bargaining. Imagine, the unwise
decision to force Estenson into a contract isn't the proper
approach to traditional bargaining.
07-20-2009
1.What the fuck are you talking about? This is
far from positive! This company is intending on weeding out more
drivers in the next 90 days.
Dear Friend, Yes, I still believe that what I see is more positive. Estenson is
truly challenging their drivers to become more professional. I think
it
is needed and we all are capable of fulfilling their demands and
expectations.
As to the weeding out drivers, I believe if drivers aren't willing
to adapt, then they will weed themselves out. Look, do I agree that
the expectations are more demanding then what we are used to? Yes,
but when you take a step back and look at what they're asking, it's
all part of the commercial driver's safety attitude that we should
have.
2. What in the hell does having a ponytail
have to do with delivering milk?
The customer, Darigold, expects to have a
cleaner and presentable work force. They have asked the carrier (Estenson)
to bring back the professional look of old. Look, you are asking the
wrong guy. I am former military and I like having a uniform and
hopefully, one that will fit.
Now, to answer your question. A ponytail, has nothing to do with the
delivery of anything. But the employer has the right to enforce
their own working conditions. By the way, pilots cannot have
ponytails and neither can police officers. The Washington State
Patrol has one of the most demanding appearance policy within the
state. Yet, they have no problem filling their job positions. The
point being made is that if you want to work, then you must comply.
3. It seems to be implied that equipment
damages not recorded or reported during pre-trip inpection will be a
safety bonus deduction and not a payroll decuction
My answer is based on the information handed
out on July 17, 2009, orientation and for quoting purposes, please
look at the "Welcome ELC drivers & Staff, Northwest
Regional-Darigold and New Driver Orientation hand out. Also the
Estenson's Employee HandBook.
There seems to be three phases to driver's
being charged.
1. Phase One ( Safety Bonus)
2. Phase two (Equipment Damages found
during pre-trip inspections)
3. Phase three ("Fix It" citations)
The subject of "Safety Bonus"(Phase
one) found on page 10 of your new orientation hand out is
quoted as saying, "Safety bonus
forfeiture can occur on the monthly accrued basis for cost related
safety infractions. Costs associated with
accidents, incidents, maintenance, freight claims, and damages are
evaluated at the end of the year and are deducted from a
driver's accumulated safety bonus,"
So, every month that you go without an
infraction of those items mentioned above, you accumulate $50.00
dollars a month. The incentive is to not have any infractions for
the year and receive the $600.00 dollars (12x50=$600) as a bonus
reward recognition. Now, lets say you have an incident anytime
during the annual accumulated period and after an investigation they
determined that it was preventable. The cost is determined to be
$100.00 dollars. At the end of the year, if all you had was this
incident for $100.00, it would be deducted from your annual
accumulated safety bonus. So, the company would subtract $100.00
dollars from $600.00 dollars, and you would be awarded $500.00
dollars.
Phase two seems to be directed toward Equipment
damages that aren't discovered or reported during the pre-trip. Page
10, Slide 20 #7 is quoted; Equipment
damages found during pre-trip inspections must be reported to
dispatch prior to moving the equipment. This applies to fresh
damages. Damaged found during a pre-trip inspection will be
investigated, and REPAIR COST charged against the last driver or
driver found to be negligent by the investigation.
What isn't clear is, if the repair cost will
be applied toward the bonus or payroll. Especially when making
reference to REPAIR COST. It seems to be implied that equipment
damages not recorded or reported during pre-trip inspection will be
a payroll deduction.
Then you have phase three.
The citation "fix it" found in the Estenson's Employee Handbook
on page 22 is quoted as saying,
Generally speaking, drivers are held personally accountable for "fix
it" citations which are deemed to have been preventable through the
completion of a thorough pre-trip inspection. Preventable citations
for parking or overweight violations may also be the personal
responsibility of the driver. Moving violations are extremely
serious offenses. Moving violations will be the FULL FINANCIAL
responsibility of the driver..
The quote above is simple and direct. If you as a driver receive a
citation for any "fix it", you're paying the bill.
I have tried to answer your question as best as I could. Notice to
all the drivers, please take the time to read your material. This
weekend your shop stewards spent five hours reading and highlighting
this material. We have a lot of work ahead of us.
4. What happens to the members with hair-tails
that won't cut them and can the union step in?
If those drivers who have hair-tails as
you put it, won't cut them in order to comply with the working
conditions, they won't be allow to work. At this time, it's too
early as to what the union can do or not do about the hair-tails.
In my opinion, we have bigger fish to fry,
then worrying about hairstyles.
5. The orientation was conducted with a taste
of non-union. Doesn't this company understand that we will be union?
This bullshit won't fly!
Yes sir, Estenson is fully aware of the need
to bargain with Local 117 and the process began on July 16, 2009. I
disagree slightly. My opinion is that the orientation was conducted
as to what they are accustomed to. This is Estenson's first time
hiring union workers and entering into bargaining. As to what bullshit you're referring to, I don't know.
The only bullshit that I am aware of, is the lousy-goosy why of
conducting business is definitely going to change. Drivers and
managers will be held accountable.
6. You cheesy mother f**#er! You sound like a
soft bitch. How much are they paying you to surrender your balls?
Some of you would question why I answer this
person. Look, I believe in the freedom of speech and no matter what
manner people choose to express themselves, they need to be heard.
Dear Friend,
You are angry. But once again you are placing the focus on personal.
This is the last question that I will answer from you, when using
this kind of verbal context. You are an adult and I want you to
conduct yourself as such.
I am speaking my opinion and if you don't like what you are reading,
then don't connect. It's that simple.
Q & A Archives
|